StratoSolar
+1 408 821 7036
  • Home
  • Technology
    • Key Enabling Insights
    • PV Generation Platforms
    • Gravity Energy Storage
    • Communications Platform
    • Proven Technologies
    • Example Complete Energy Solution for the UK
    • Common Concerns >
      • Airspace
      • Hurricanes
      • FAQ
    • Gallery of Images >
      • Platform Shadow Videos
      • Japan Energy Solution Map
      • 2050 World Energy Sankey Diagram
      • 2050 Synthetic Fuel solution
      • 2050 Electricity solution
      • Climate Change Videos
  • Benefits
    • Low Cost Generation
    • Low Cost Energy Storage
    • Cost Reduction Roadmap
    • Sustainable and Scale-able
    • Zero Carbon
    • Energy Security
  • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Login
    • Presentations
    • Gallery >
      • PV Documents >
        • PV Big Picture policy level document
        • PV California deployment
        • PV Japan deployment
        • PV UK deployment
        • Wind and Buoyancy Forces
  • Related Sites
  • Solve for x Videos

California is an emerging practical example of the limits to renewables penetration of electricity generation.  

12/12/2016

Comments

 
In a previous post on the limits to renewables penetration, I mentioned California as an example that is starting to face this issue already. This article discusses California’s short term problem and this NREL study discusses what California must do to achieve its 2030 goal of 50% renewables penetration of electricity generation. California is starting to deal with the reality of delivering a real electricity SYSTEM solution, not just generation. The NREL study shows the large degree of change to all aspects of the electricity system and the optimistic rate of improvement in PV and especially storage necessary to achieve 50% penetration.

Solar has grown dramatically in California over the last few years, but is still only about 5% of generation and growing fast. Its generally accepted that without energy storage, renewables with fossil fuel backup cannot exceed a penetration of more than their capacity factor. Depending on how you measure it, Solar's capacity factor in California is 25% at best, so it would seem a long way from having problems at only 5% penetration. However as solar grows, the article points out an emerging problem that is called the duck curve after the shape of the graph of daily electricity generation from sources other than solar when solar is added to the grid. The issue is the rate at which fossil fuel generation needs to ramp up as the sun goes down and solar generation ceases, particularly around the spring equinox in late march. Most of current grid generation cannot ramp quickly and what can, is very inefficient. This highlights that incorporating growing percentages of renewable energy into the grid exposes new problems all along the way. Even at these low penetration levels, storage is starting to be a necessary element.

In Europe, high renewables penetration in local markets is possible because Europe is geographically small and connected and majority areas with low renewables penetration balance the overall small renewables penetration. The California grid is relatively isolated and cannot avail of this help.

The NREL report further highlights the longer-term problem of California achieving its goal of 50% renewables by 2030. If renewables have an average capacity factor of 25%, 50% is way beyond their achievable penetration without storage. NREL conclude that 50% is only achievable with high levels of storage in the region of 19GW to 30GW depending on assumptions. For perspective, this is for a grid that maximally demands 60GW. Even at $1/W, that is a lot of money by 2030. There is no large scale deployable storage today. Todays batteries are expensive and cannot handle the deep daily cycling for 20 or 30 years required of a viable electricity storage technology. Even when they can meet a $1/W cost and adequate reliability, they are still an additional cost of at least as much as the cost of generation. To address long term outages that cannot be handled by storage, it is proposed to build a large amount of long distance transmission (an issue not covered by NREL). This would cost at least the cost of generation. The true cost of a 100% fossil fuel free electricity SYSTEM on the path being pursued by California is then at least three times the cost of already expensive PV generation which NREL assumes will fall to $0.03/kWh by 2030. California is rich and its consumers already pay twice the national average for electricity. This cost will inevitably rise.

These costly realities have not yet penetrated the broad consciousness of alternative energy supporters.
​
By Edmund Kelly
Comments
comments powered by Disqus

    Ed Kelly

    President of StratoSolar

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    February 2023
    November 2022
    October 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    November 2010

    Categories

    All
    All Energy
    Alternative Energy
    Bill Gates
    China
    Clean Energy Investment
    Clean Energy Price
    Desalination
    Developing World
    Energy
    Energy-investment
    Energy Policy
    Germany
    Helium
    Japan Energy Pv
    Land Use
    O3b
    Pv
    PV Bubble
    Pv Subsidies
    Stratosolar
    Us Subsidies
    Wireless Communications

    RSS Feed

 © 2023 StratoSolar Inc. All rights reserved. ​618 S. 8th Street, Suite 400B, Richmond, CA 94804
Contact Us